la biblioteca of FZLINE

Books on "know your enemy:" my first suggestion is "Knowing the enemy:Jihadist ideology and the war on Terror, by Mary Habeck, Yale University Press, 2006

we

In these turbolent timese the reading of We by Yevgeny Zamyatin will help us to still believe in the power of creativity and freedom.

a meaningless word

it is amazing that the word Islamophobia has spread so much and it means nothing.

Islamophobia?

From www.danielpipes.org | Original article available at: www.danielpipes.org/article/3075

Islamophobia?

by Daniel Pipes
New York Sun
October 25, 2005

An Islamist group named Hizb ut-Tahrir seeks to bring the world under Islamic law and advocates suicide attacks against Israelis. Facing proscription in Great Britain, it opened a clandestine front operation at British universities called "Stop Islamophobia," the Sunday Times has disclosed.

Stop what, you ask?

Coined in Great Britain a decade ago, the neologism Islamophobia was launched in 1996 by a self-proclaimed "Commission on British Muslims and Islamophobia." The word literally means "undue fear of Islam" but it is used to mean "prejudice against Muslims" and joins over 500 other phobias spanning virtually every aspect of life.

The term has achieved a degree of linguistic and political acceptance, to the point that the secretary-general of the United Nations presided over a December 2004 conference titled "Confronting Islamophobia" and in May a Council of Europe summit condemned "Islamophobia."

The term presents several problems, however. First, what exactly constitutes an "undue fear of Islam" when Muslims acting in the name of Islam today make up the premier source of worldwide aggression, both verbal and physical, versus non-Muslims and Muslims alike? What, one wonders, is the proper amount of fear?

Second, while prejudice against Muslims certainly exists, "Islamophobia" deceptively conflates two distinct phenomena: fear of Islam and fear of radical Islam. I personally experience this problem: Despite writing again and again against radical Islam the ideology, not Islam the religion, I have been made the runner-up for a mock "Islamophobia Award" in Great Britain, deemed America's "leading Islamophobe," and even called an "Islamophobe Incarnate." (What I really am is an "Islamism-ophobe.")

Third, promoters of the "Islamophobia" concept habitually exaggerate the problem:

• Law enforcement: British Muslims are said to suffer from persistent police discrimination but an actual review of the statistics by Kenan Malik makes mincemeat of this "Islamophobia myth."

• Cultural: Muslims "are faced with an extreme flow of anti-Islamic literature that preaches hatred against Islam," claims the president of the Graduate School of Islamic and Social Sciences in Virginia, Taha Jabir Al-‘Alwani: "novels, movies, books and researches. Just among the best selling novels alone there are almost 1000 novels of this type." One thousand bestsellers vilify Islam? Hardly. In fact, barely a handful do so (for example, The Haj, by Leon Uris).

• Linguistic: A professor of Islamic studies at George Washington University, Seyyed Hossein Nasr, falsely reported (in his keynote speech at a U.N. event, "Confronting Islamophobia," reports Alexander Joffe) attempts to hide the Arabic origins of English words such as adobe – which derives in fact from ancient Egyptian, not from Arabic.

• Historical: The term anti-Semitism was originally used to describe sentiment against Arabs living in Spain, Mr. Nasr also stated in his speech, and was not linked to Jews until after World War II. Nonsense: anti-Semitism dates back only to 1879, when it was coined by Wilhelm Marr, and has always referred specifically to hatred of Jews.

Fourth, Hizb ut-Tahrir's manipulation of "Stop Islamophobia" betrays the fraudulence of this word. As the Sunday Times article explains, "Ostensibly the campaign's goal is to fight anti-Muslim prejudice in the wake of the London bombings," but it quotes Anthony Glees of London's Brunel University to the effect that the real agenda is to spread anti-Semitic, anti-Hindu, anti-Sikh, anti-homosexual, and anti-female attitudes, as well as to foment resentment of Western influence.

Finally, calling moderate Muslims (such as Irshad Manji) Islamophobes betrays this term's aggressiveness. As Charles Moore writes in the Daily Telegraph, moderate Muslims, "frightened of what the Islamists are turning their faith into," are the ones who most fear Islam. (Think of Algeria, Darfur, Iraq, Iran, and Afghanistan.) "They cannot find the courage and the words to get to grips with the huge problem that confronts Islam in the modern world." Accusations of Islamophobia, Mr. Malik adds, are intended "to silence critics of Islam, or even Muslims fighting for reform of their communities." Another British Muslim, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, discerns an even more ambitious goal: "all too often Islamophobia is used to blackmail society."

Muslims should dispense with this discredited term and instead engage in some earnest introspection. Rather than blame the potential victim for fearing his would-be executioner, they would do better to ponder how Islamists have transformed their faith into an ideology celebrating murder (Al-Qaeda: "You love life, we love death") and develop strategies to redeem their religion by combating this morbid totalitarianism.

From www.danielpipes.org | Original article available at: www.danielpipes.org/article/3075

Howard's thoughts

I welcome with great joy the writing of my good friend Howard. As you can see his text is unedited. The first amendment's power!


Bill Clinton says that he doesn't want anyone to die before his time anymore. Well isn't that nice. I wonder why he didn't take it one step further and add that he doesn't want anyone ever to get sick anymore. These are the kind of remarks that really resonate with the useful idiots on the left. The social engineering liberal idiots that are ensconced in their make believe ivy league world and in Congress. It was that kind of wishful thinking in Europe prior to WWII that cost millions of lives and certain to cost the lives of millions more once again today.

This jovial over sexed dope, our ex-president, along with his scheming wife (don't forget we got two for one with this election) probably, more than any other Americans (with the possible exception of Jimmy Carter and company) through his lack of response to attacks against the U.S. Cole, the African embassies, and the first WTC attack amongst others, are primarily responsible for tearing down our defenses, destroying the CIA and allowing the Muslims to perpetrate their mass murders on 9/11.

Don't be fooled into thinking that these are harmless idealists with lofty ideas whose only crime is that they let their innate "goodness" (they have a virtual monopoly on goodness) cloud their judgment. No, these people are dangerous. They are very dangerous. And because they do not understand the central challenge in the world today---the pure evilness of fundamentalist Islam--- they are putting us in grave and constant danger.

Now we have George Bush who supposedly received some sort of mandate in the last election, but, as yet, with all his pandering to the left and trying to be all things to all people, apparently does not realize that he won last November. He warned Americans recently that there would be an upsurge in violence against the Iraqi people and our military prior to the Iraqi elections on Oct. 15th. That's it? That's our offence? He should be warning the insurgents about an upsurge in violence coming from America and directed towards them.

How do you like this? The barbarians are terrorizing America and the most powerful military in the history of the world. He should be taking out every village the insurgents are using to hide along the Syrian border. And yes I said village. We should be going into every insurgent stronghold wherever it is with aerial attacks not with our fine American boys. They are filtering back into Falujah? Fine. Level Falujah. Follow the Romans. Salt the land. It isn't worth one American casualty.

Iran is sending explosive devices to Iraq and Syria is allowing insurgents to enter Iraq through their porous borders to kill Americans? Aren't these acts of war? Maybe if we sent a cruise missile through Assad's palace he would understand that America frowns on such activity. And isn't it tiring, this back and forth with Iran. You negotiate the price of an automobile not lives. Take out their nuclear capacity now. Tell them that every time we find a "made in Iran" bomb in Iraq they will pay a stiff military price.

This is the only language these maniacs understand. I don't understand why we
are fighting these 5th century barbarians on their terms. What are we saving our technological power for? World War III? I have news flash for George Bush. This is World War III and he had better realize that before it's too late. If it
isn't too late already. Isn't it about time that we started doing some terrorizing of our own? Howard

It is refreshimg to know somebody who knows what she wants. 

Almost 4 years after 9/11, people still don't have the guts to tell the truth about our lethal enemy.

August 17, 2005
A Glimpse of Forces Confronting Saudi Rule
By WILLIAM GRIMES
Western reporting on Saudi Arabia has been in attack mode ever since Sept. 11. Not since the Borgias has a ruling family received such bad press as the House of Saud, and the United States-Saudi connection is probably the one that Americans would most like to sever, if it could be done without raising gasoline prices.

In "Saudi Arabia Exposed," John R. Bradley, a British journalist who spent two and a half years as a newspaper editor and reporter in Saudi Arabia, will not make Americans feel any better about the Saudi royals, whom he calls "perhaps the most corrupt family the world has ever known." But he does provide a highly informed, temperate and understanding account of a country that, he maintains, is an enigma to other Arabs, and even to the Saudis themselves.

The book's accusatory tabloid title does not reflect its tone. "Inside Saudi Arabia" might have been better. Mr. Bradley, although based in Jedda, traveled far and wide throughout the country in an effort to map the regional tensions and cultural distinctions that make Saudi Arabia much more diverse and complicated than the smooth propaganda of its government would allow.

The House of Saud and the religious establishment, fired by the puritanical form of Islam known as Wahhabism , hold sway in the central region, al-Najd; elsewhere rifts and tensions abound. Mr. Bradley's heart is in the Hijaz, and the lingering cosmopolitanism of Jeddah, whose great merchant families tend to take a much more worldly view of politics and religion, including (with one notable exception) the bin Ladens. When the Saudi religious police objected to the use of a plus sign instead of an ampersand in a company's name because it resembled a Christian cross, a writer for the region's main newspaper, Al-Medina, suggested that perhaps the symbol should be replaced with a "tasteful Islamic crescent" in the country's math books.

In the 1920's and 1930's, Ibn Saud created a unified state from the disparate tribes of present-day Saudi Arabia by force, imposing a brand of Islam that, in many areas of the country, is regarded as alien. In Asir, on the border with Yemen in southeastern Saudi Arabia, Wahabbism has been accepted only reluctantly. Mr. Bradley sees women driving pick-up trucks, and in the remote hills he encounters a strange sect known as the flower men, who wear garlands of flowers and herbs and douse themselves in perfume.

In the southwest, Shiites, who constitute a majority, chafe under religious oppression and an official policy intended to convert them to Wahabbism. One official put the matter starkly: "We don't eat their food, we don't intermarry with them, we should not pray for their dead or allow them to be buried in our cemeteries." In April 2000, armed Shiites in Najran rose up against Saudi security forces, and their co-religionists in the Eastern Province, site of huge oil reserves, are also restive.

Saudi Arabia's young people make up another worrying constituency. Mr. Bradley strolls the malls and sits in secluded bedrooms with many disaffected Saudis. Those who travel to the West seem to bring back little more than a degree and a pile of consumer goods. Those who do not travel sit and fester. Waited on hand and foot, they watch satellite television or, using illegal computer cards to bypass the censors, log on to X-rated chat rooms on the Internet. Parents, Mr. Bradley writes, have delegated traditional responsibilities to a despised class of mostly Asian drivers, servants and nannies. As never before, young Saudis have been left to their own devices and easily fall prey to jihadist recruiters.

It comes as a shock to find that Saudi Arabia has something like a gay scene and a nascent feminist movement. In severely repressing all forms of interaction between men and women, the country leaves a large social space open to men, who are free to pursue relations with one another. "I don't feel oppressed at all," one gay man tells the author. "We have more freedom here than straight couples. After all, they can't kiss in public like we can, or stroll down the street holding one another's hands."

Half inch by half inch, the government has been opening the professions to women, who can now obtain commercial licenses and who now account for more than half of the kingdom's university graduates. Since liberal arguments have failed to move the clerical establishment, a new wave of Saudi women have turned to Islam, and Muhammad's earliest teachings, to develop legal ideas that are, so to speak, more fundamental than Wahabbi fundamentalism.

Mr. Bradley tends to leap at the merest glimmer of light. His liberals and reformers, however attractive, hold very weak cards, and the regime has shown itself extraordinarily resistant to change. But modern communications, and the government's grudging baby steps toward democratic reform, he argues, may be the first cracks that, spreading inexorably, could bring down the House of Saud.

Saudis and their tribal leaders have been changed by the oil money that bought their loyalty in the 1970's. Expectations have risen, as well as disillusionment that so few benefited from oil revenues. The war in Iraq, Mr. Bradley argues, "will come back to haunt the Al-Saud." Already, home-grown terrorists have adopted the insurgent tactics being used in Iraq, and battle-hardened Saudi volunteers will eventually return home. Prince Turki bin Khalid, a member of the ruling family, recently bought two apartments in the Time-Warner Center on Columbus Circle in Manhattan for a reported $8.1 million. One is for friends; the other he plans to keep empty. Mr. Bradley has a strong suspicion that he may need it.

The Europeans never learn. 

Editorial : There is no clash of civilizations.

For a clash of civilizations to exist, you must have at least two civilizations.
In our historic moment, we have the western civilization with the maximum of achievements and a culture of seventh century with simple minded, repetive and emotional degrading hate for every thing that the Western Civilization has developed:
"I believe that our western civilization is , in spite of all the faults that can quite justifiably be found with it, the most free, the most just, the most humanitarian and the best of all those we have ever known throughout the history of human kind. It is the best because it has the greatest capacity for improvement. … It is only in our western civilization that the moral demand for personal freedom is widely acknowledge and even widely realized, along with the demand for equality before the law, for peace, and for the minimum of force.
This is why I regard our western civilization as the best to date. Of course it is in need of improvement. But, when all is said and done, it is the only civilization in which almost everyone is working together to improve it as much as possible.
Karl Popper

A society without democracy would be inhuman. It would not be a human society, but an ant colony.

The European struggle for freedom against Saudi Arabian Wahhabbi attacks, it not national freedom is personal freedom. Freedom is no mere ideology, but a way of life which make life better and more worth living.

there is a euphemism for everything and the polite way of saying "it is a lie" is " they say allege'(za 'amu) Arabic saying

It is time to give up the mantra that Saudi Arabia is our friend keeping down the price 

Locked in a deadly struggle for freedom

Sacred freedom By Ian Buruma Published: August 5 2005 11:07 Last updated: August 5 2005 11:07 From Financial Times
Having lunch with Ayaan Hirsi Ali is not a straightforward affair. Apart from being a Dutch parliamentarian for the VVD (liberal/conservatives), the young Somali-born politician is an activist for women�s rights, especially of Muslim women who are the victims of customs and �honour� codes that Hirsi Ali would like to see abolished. She wrote the script for the polemical short film Submission, directed by Theo van Gogh, who was murdered in November last year by an Islamist fanatic who was sentenced to life in prison last month. Hirsi Ali, Muslim-born and raised and openly critical of the Prophet (a pervert), would have been the killer's preferred target, but since she had been under police protection since 2002, Van Gogh, who refused bodyguards, was probably killed, as it were, faute de mieux.
Hirsi Ali cannot take a step without an entourage of large, sharp-eyed men in sunglasses and suits. When we met in Paris, at the Brasserie de Bourbon - opposite the French parliament where she had just delivered a speech about immigration and integration - some of these men kept an eye on us from outside and some sat down at another table, scanning the joint over bottles of mineral water.
Hirsi Ali, beautiful, slim, black, dressed in a dark skirt and an elegant pink-and-cream jacket, complained about the lack of international co-ordination in security matters. She had to bring her own guards, she said, who didn�t speak French and were not allowed to carry their guns into the parliament building. Long and tedious negotiations were required to get round this �stupid rule - not the best way to fight terrorism�. Few things annoy her more than stupid rules: rules that make the world less safe, rules that stifle enterprise, rules that oppress women.
The other factor that made our lunch less than straightforward was Hirsi Ali�s love of sunlight; we had to keep changing tables and venues. �Oh no,� muttered one of the guards, �not another cafe.� But she was so delighted to be able to walk the streets and sit in cafes - something she cannot do in Holland - that our lunch turned into a moveable feast, ending, appropriately enough, at Hemmingway�s old Left Bank haunt, cafe Les Deux Magots.
Ordering mid-morning coffees, I ask her why Theo van Gogh refused protection. �Theo,� she replies, �was a free spirit and had no high regard for the Dutch police.� Does she? Since her life depends on the men at the next table, this is perhaps an impertinent question. But her answer would not have bothered them. �At the street level, they are very good, but they are underpaid and underappreciated. The top guys, on the other hand, are overpaid, overappreciated and closed to the rest of the world.�
Shivering a little in the morning chill and looking for a sunnier spot, she tells me how lower-ranking Dutch policemen have to prove their diligence by the number of tasks accomplished. It is much easier to hand out parking tickets than, say, to take care of domestic violence in Muslim households, and you get the same pay for it. Bureaucratic hurdles are also daunting; one mistake and you can lose your job. Underpaid, harassed and resentful of their bosses, �it is these kinds of people who end up leaving the big cities. One day people will wake up and say, `Oh, my God, the whole city is black.� And what�s happening in Amsterdam and Rotterdam will happen to the whole country.�
On this note, Hirsi Ali suggests we repair to a warmer spot inside. The men in suits jump up and quickly case the establishment. Hirsi Ali smiles into the noonday sun. We are both Dutch citizens. She moved to The Netherlands 13 years ago, at the age of 22, to escape from an arranged marriage in Canada. I live in New York. Her grandparents were Somali nomads. Mine were from various parts of Europe. We are sitting in a French cafe and for the sake of this article we speak mostly in English, although her Dutch is fluent. A perfect picture of our multicultural world.
I urge her to order something to eat. She says she can�t face a thing yet and orders a second bottle of water. She talks about a Colombian woman in The Hague who started a little neighbourhood restaurant. It was all fine, but for one irritating flaw. When Hirsi Ali ordered a glass of wine, the lady said she couldn�t serve wine. Why ever not? Because she only had one toilet. To serve alcohol you have to have two. That is the rule. Hirsi Ali sighs: �This woman had gone through all the government-sponsored citizenship courses to learn how to become an entrepreneur. And then she has to face these silly rules and regulations. That is why so many Somalis move to the UK, where there are fewer restrictions. They flourish there.�
How about in the US, where she has recently spent time? �I feel more and more at home in New York. You see people of all colours. So many people of colour are successful there. You realise that it is nothing genetic.�
Hirsi Ali finally orders something to eat, a succulent quiche lorraine. We return to the subject of Muslim immigrants and their difficulties in finding their place in European societies. Her own case - from cleaning lady in an asylum shelter to world famous politician in 13 years - is exceptional. Having lived 11 years in Kenya, she spoke perfect English. She was a well-educated young woman when she boarded the train from Germany to The Netherlands. She craved freedom, and lapped it up when she found it. �The way Dutch women talked openly to each other about sex, in great detail. This was extraordinary to me.� She picks at her quiche and observes that Moroccans and Turks stay within their own circles. She doesn�t suffer from that kind of peer pressure. �I have nobody to accuse me of being decadent, westernised, a traitor, a... slut. There�s no one to remind me of my roots all the time. This is good for one�s mindset.�
There are plenty of people who do accuse her of those things and some have even tried to kill her. But they are strangers. Hirsi Ali fought for her place in Dutch society by letting go of her past. This is why she hates people explaining (and sometimes dismissing) her strong views on Islam by referring to her background: her circumcision in Somalia, her family�s exile in Saudi Arabia, her run-ins with Muslim teachers, her forced marriage. These things, she says, �are irrelevant to my argument�. What enrages her is not her private history but the fact that Muslim women �cannot exercise their freedoms in Holland, because their own families continue to practise their cultures and Dutch authorities encourage this by telling people to stick to their own ways�.
The sunlight has shifted. We change tables. The guards take up new positions. The half-eaten quiche is pushed away. Coffees are ordered.
When she was much younger, she was a devout Muslim, who believed that Salman Rushdie deserved to die for insulting the Prophet. Then, at Leyden University, where she read political science, she discovered Karl Popper on the open society, Spinoza on free thinking and Hayek on individualism. As her Muslim beliefs faded, she became an activist. Islam, she often says, needs its own Voltaire. The script she wrote for Theo van Gogh�s film, which features projections of Koranic texts on to the half-naked bodies of veiled women, was conceived in this spirit.
Hirsi Ali�s parents are still devout. Her father, a former politician who was jailed for his opposition to dictatorship in Somalia, still prays for his daughter�s return to the faith. Both her parents support her struggle for women�s rights but they do not believe that female oppression is rooted in Islam. Hirsi Ali disagrees: �If you read the Koran and the Hadith, you see the oppression of women in the text. That was a shock even to me.� Since so much about traditional Islam is incompatible, in her view, with secular, liberal society, drastic measures must be taken. Religious schools should be abolished. The Dutch constitution, which makes provisions for state-funded religious education, should be rewritten. The Dutch state must defend its secularism, like the French Republic. Islam must be reformed.
Before getting into a discussion about the finer points of religious reform, we debate the merits of moving to a pastry shop nearby. Hirsi Ali is basking in the sunlight, like a contented cat. �I feel safer outside Holland,� she says. �Different people, different languages. A false sense of security, I�m sure.�
So how can the faith be reformed? Hirsi Ali has given this a lot of thought. �First of all, we must agree on what is right, what is friendly to human beings. Then you see what is not and you modify everything. On relations between men and women, we must consider the circumstances when the laws were invented and then move on,� she says.
This is all reasonable, which may be part of the problem. Too much reason can reform a faith away, which would be fine with Hirsi Ali, who regards herself as an atheist. �My opponents will say that with my ideas Islam will be like what they have in the west. Sure, I say, but we drive western cars, so why not borrow western ideas. Universal rights were invented here, but are not unique to the west. That is why they are universal.�
With that we decide to move on for a pastry. �Another cafe?� asks the bodyguard. Ayaan Hirsi Ali smiles, delighted with the mere fact of being alive.